RPE Calculator

RPE chart: percent of 1RM by reps and RPE

Find your reps along the top and your RPE down the side. Each cell is the share of your one-rep max that the set took: 5 reps at RPE 8 is 81.1%. The chart covers 1–12 reps and RPE 6.5–10 in half steps, the range Reactive Training Systems publishes; it has no RPE 6 row.

Percent of 1RM by reps (columns) and RPE (rows), Reactive Training Systems chart
RPE / reps123456789101112
10100.0%95.5%92.2%89.2%86.3%83.7%81.1%78.6%76.2%73.9%70.7%68.0%
9.597.8%93.9%90.7%87.8%85.0%82.4%79.9%77.4%75.1%72.3%69.4%66.7%
995.5%92.2%89.2%86.3%83.7%81.1%78.6%76.2%73.9%70.7%68.0%65.3%
8.593.9%90.7%87.8%85.0%82.4%79.9%77.4%75.1%72.3%69.4%66.7%64.0%
892.2%89.2%86.3%83.7%81.1%78.6%76.2%73.9%70.7%68.0%65.3%62.6%
7.590.7%87.8%85.0%82.4%79.9%77.4%75.1%72.3%69.4%66.7%64.0%61.3%
789.2%86.3%83.7%81.1%78.6%76.2%73.9%70.7%68.0%65.3%62.6%59.9%
6.587.8%85.0%82.4%79.9%77.4%75.1%72.3%69.4%66.7%64.0%61.3%58.6%

The chart is one series shifted by a rep per RPE point. For example, 4 reps at RPE 8, 5 reps at RPE 9 and 6 reps at RPE 10 are all 83.7%, because each is a set you could have stretched to 6 reps.

Some RPE charts online use slightly different numbers; one lists a single at RPE 9.5 as 98.0%. The values here are the ones Reactive Training Systems publishes, where that cell is 97.8%. Mike Tuchscherer of Reactive Training Systems adds: “it is best if you customize the given RPE chart to fit yourself as an athlete.”

RPE as reps in reserve (RIR)

In lifting, RPE is scored by the reps you had left at the end of the set. This is the scale Zourdos and colleagues published in 2016:

RIR-based RPE scale (Zourdos et al. 2016, reprinted in Helms et al. 2016)
RPEMeaning
10Maximum effort
91 rep remaining
82 reps remaining
73 reps remaining
5–64–6 reps remaining
3–4Light effort
1–2Little to no effort

The RTS chart adds half steps such as 8.5, between two reps left and one. Helms and colleagues point out that a scale of this kind first appeared in The Reactive Training Systems Manual in 2008, from the company that publishes the chart above. In the 2016 study, experienced squatters rated their 1RM attempts closer to 10 than novices did (9.80 against 8.96), and Helms and colleagues advise new lifters to practice rating sets before relying on them.

Sources

  1. Tuchscherer M. Customizing Your RPE Chart. Reactive Training Systems, 2016-01-06 (the chart and the advice to customize it).
  2. Tuchscherer M. Why Percentage Programs Should Still Track RPE. Reactive Training Systems, 2017-03-29 (same chart values).
  3. Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, et al. Novel Resistance Training-Specific Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale Measuring Repetitions in Reserve. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):267–275.
  4. Helms ER, Cronin J, Storey A, Zourdos MC. Application of the Repetitions in Reserve-Based Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale for Resistance Training. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(4):42–49 (open access).
  5. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How to Measure Physical Activity Intensity. 2025-12-04.